What we publish
Guides explain a task using cited documentation and clearly marked examples. Comparisons describe documented capabilities and tradeoffs. A benchmark requires recorded experiments; we do not call a documentation review a hands-on test.
Our commercial interest
TrueFetch is developing web data APIs and may participate in the categories we discuss. We identify our own planned capabilities as planned. We do not infer that our service is faster, cheaper or more reliable without a comparable experiment.
What a measured review needs
We will publish the task, sampling method, date, versions, configuration, limits and repeat count. Results must include failed attempts and distinguish elapsed time from compute time. Cost comparisons use equivalent useful output, including deduplication and required fields—not an assumption that different providers' credits mean the same thing.
When ground truth is unavailable, we describe completeness or consistency rather than claiming accuracy. A few successful calls cannot establish production reliability. No production TrueFetch benchmark is available in this preview.
Examples and cases
Our sample tasks use illustrative data and prices. A real customer case requires real evidence and permission; we do not turn a demo into a customer story.
Dates, sources and corrections
Each new guide names its publication date and links its sources. Provider prices, access rules and SDK behavior should be rechecked before use. Material changes will be dated. Translations must retain the original limitations and evidence.
Send a correction with the page URL, the disputed statement and a supporting source to [email protected]. Do not send account credentials or private datasets.
Read the journal →